|
Stated Objective |
Beginning
1. |
Developing
2. |
Accomplished
3. |
Exemplary
4. |
Total Score |
|
The oral presentation was the proper time length
|
The time was well
below the required amount |
The time was just
slightly less than what was required |
The time was
adequate |
The time exceeded
the limit and was efficiently used |
|
|
Notes were seldom refereed to and material seemed well known |
Knowledge of the
topic was totally lacking and notes had to be read constantly |
Some knowledge
of the topic was shown, but notes had to be used far too often |
Notes were used, but in an appropri-
ate amount, with knowledge of the material adequate |
Noted were seldom looked at
and knowledge of the material was extensive |
|
| The Cooperative
Learning Group functioned well |
Little cooperation
was evident and little team did not function as a unit |
Some cooperation
was evident but little was accom- plished as a team |
Cooperation and
teamwork were usually evident and success was a product of the teamwork |
The team did everything together and functioned as a
"well oiled" machine |
|
| The visual aide was effective and
helped the class better understand the presentation
|
The visual aide was poorly done
and showed minimal effort |
The visual aide showed effort but
was not effective and did little to help the class understand the presentation |
Considerable effort was evident
and the class was better able to understand the report |
Great effort was
evident and a far greater understanding of the topic was possible because of the visual |
|
|
The Power Point presentation was well done and showed great effort |
The Power Point
presentation either was not ready to use or showed very little effort |
The Power Point
presentation was adequate but not very effective and was minimally helpful for the class |
The Power Point
presentation was well done and helped the class know about the topic |
The Power Point
presentation was very well done, well presented, and helped the class understand the presentation |